Published date:
We know that language is powerful. It shapes how we see the world and how we treat each other. That is why we are changing the way we talk about ethnicity in our communications.
We are moving away from using the term ‘BAME’ (Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic). Instead, we will use ‘global majority’ when we need to talk about people from minoritised ethnic groups as a whole.
Wherever possible, we will be specific about people’s ethnic backgrounds (for example, Pakistani, Indian, Black Caribbean etc). But sometimes, when we are discussing patterns or experiences around racism, we will group communities together and clearly explain who we mean.
Why are we doing this?
- BAME’ is being replaced in many organisations
Many organisations including the UK Government and our Race Equity Network have moved away from using the term ‘BAME’. This is because it groups different communities together, which can hide their individual experiences and challenges. It can also suggest an ‘us and them’ way of thinking, placing whiteness as the norm. However, we understand that some organisations may still use the term, and we respect their choices
- ‘Global majority’ is a more appropriate and affirming term
The term ‘global majority’ is now more widely used in anti - racism conversations and work. First introduced by Rosemary Campbell Stephens, it recognises that people of Black, Asian, Indigenous, and other minoritised backgrounds actually belong to a large global community. This term challenges the idea of these groups as ‘minorities’ and instead recognises their strength, importance and voice.
It reflects our values. We want everyone who lives and works with us to feel seen, heard and respected. The words we use matter – and this is one way we can show our commitment to fairness and inclusion.
We know there’s no perfect phrase, and language can change over time. But we believe this is a more respectful and empowering way to talk about ethnicity and we’ll keep listening and learning as we go.